Curtis Williams Sentenced to 65 Years for Murder

Apr 03, 2024

Jury Rejected William's Argument for Voluntary Manslaughter

On April 3, 2024, a Madison County Circuit Court 4 jury found Curtis Williams, 63, guilty of Murder for the 2022 stabbing death of his wife, Claudette.  The jury deliberated for an hour and a half before rejecting Williams' argument for Voluntary Manslaughter and rendering a verdict of guilty for Murder. 


A sentencing hearing was held on May 3, 2024, where Williams faced a sentencing range of 45-65 years.  Judge Mark Dudley imposed a maximum sentence of 65 years to be executed at the Indiana Department of Correction.


The State's case was presented by Deputy Prosecutors Matt Savage and Gabriella Capocelli.  The case was investigated by Detective Travis Thompson of the Anderson Police Department.


According to the probable cause affidavit filed by Anderson Police Department Detective Travis Thompson, Williams called dispatch and said he killed his wife.  Williams was interviewed by investigators at St. Vincent Anderson Hospital while being treated for a cut on his left arm. He told investigators that he found his wife with another man in the bedroom.  Williams said he chased the man from his house and claimed Claudette stabbed him with a kitchen knife.  At trial, the State produced evidence that the injury to Williams' arm was self-inflicted. 



Madison County Prosecutor's Office News

02 May, 2024
Wilson Faces a Possible Sentence of 62 Years
25 Apr, 2024
MCPO Hosts 3rd Annual Prayer for Peace During National Crime Victims' Rights Week
19 Apr, 2024
A Madison County Circuit Court 4 jury took only twenty minutes to return guilty verdicts in the trial of State of Indiana v. Ricky D. Johnson. Johnson was convicted of three counts of Dealing in Methamphetamine as Level 2 felonies after a three day jury trial. Johnson admitted to being a Habitual Offender and Judge David Happe set sentencing for May 21st at 9 am where Johnson faces a possible sentence of 16-50 years. At trial, the State's case was presented by Deputy Prosecutors Kady Coulon and Jennifer Haley. The case was investigated by Detective LeeAnn Dwiggins and the Madison County Drug Task Force.
15 Apr, 2024
On May 3, 2000, while on electronic monitoring for violating his parole, 16-year-old Joshua Davies broke into his next-door-neighbor’s home by cutting a screen and opening a kitchen window. Davies then entered the bedroom of thirteen-year-old Jessica Lyons, hit her on the head with a hammer and attempted to rape her. Lindsay Haston, Jessica’s sister, rushed into the room to stop Davies and Davies hit her in the head with a hammer until she “blacked-out.” Jessica’s father, Rob Lyons, awoke and chased Davies out of the home. Jessica later died from multiple blunt force injuries to her head. On May 9, 2000, the State charged Joshua Davies with Criminal Confinement, a Class B felony; Rape, a Class A felony; Child Molesting, a Class A felony; Burglary Resulting in Bodily Injury, a Class A felony; Aggravated Battery, a Class B felony; Attempted Murder, a Class A felony; and Murder, a felony. Due to the charges and Davies’ age, the case was filed directly in adult court. On August 31, 2000, the State filed an amended information requesting a death sentence. On December 27, 2000, Davies signed a plea agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, he agreed to plead guilty to Burglary Resulting in Bodily Injury, a Class A felony; Aggravated Battery, a Class B felony, Murder, a felony, and Criminal Deviate Conduct, a Class A felony. The plea left the sentence open to the trial court ranging from a term of years to Life Without Parole. A bench trial was held on February 5-6, 2001, in front of Judge Dennis Carroll. Following the presentation of evidence, Judge Carroll found the aggravation outweighed the mitigation and sentenced Davies to an aggregate executed sentence of 108 years. Specifically, the Court sentenced Davies to 26 years for Criminal Deviate Conduct, a Class A felony, 62 years for Murder, a felony, and 20 years for Burglary Resulting in Bodily Injury, a Class A felony. Each of the sentences were ordered served consecutive to each other at the Indiana Department of Correction. The sentence was affirmed on appeal on November 28, 2001 in Davies v. State , 758 N.E.2d 981 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001). On June 25, 2014, Davies filed a pro se Petition for Post-Conviction Relief. The Public Defender’s Office entered its appearance on behalf of Davies on July 24, 2014. On August 5, 2022, Davies’ post-conviction counsel filed an Amended Post-Conviction Petition alleging: (1) the plea was not entered into a knowing, intelligent and voluntary manner, (2) trial counsel was ineffective; (3) appellate counsel was ineffective; (4) Davies’ de facto life without parole sentence violates the federal and state constitutions; (5) there is newly discovered evidence based on advances in developmental psychology and neuroscience, and (6) Davies’ sentence is inappropriate due to significant changes in the legal landscape since imposition of his sentence. On August 21, 2023, Davies filed an additional claim that Davies’ sentence violates the prohibition against Cruel and Unusual Punishment. An evidentiary hearing was held on the Petition for Post-Conviction Relief on September 8, 2023, where Davies and the State of Indiana presented evidence. Judge Angela Warner Sims, special judge, issued Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on April 12, 2024. Therein, Judge Sims denied all of Davies claims, concluding: Petitioner’s guilty plea was knowing and voluntary. Petitioner has failed to carry his burden and relief is DENIED. Petitioner has failed to carry his burden to prove ineffectiveness of trial or appellate counsel, and his claims for relief are DENIED. Petitioner’s claims pertaining to the appropriateness of his sentence are barred by the doctrine of res judicata . However, even if the court was permitted to consider them, for the reasons stated herein, the court cannot find that Petitioner’s sentence is inappropriate under current Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B). Petitioner’s sentence is not cruel and unusual punishment, not does his continued incarceration violate Ind. Const., Art. 1, s. 18. Petitioner’s claims for relief under those two constitutional provisions are DENIED.
12 Apr, 2024
Join us for the 3rd Annual Prayer for Peace!
More Posts
Share by: